In one of my previous posts I touched briefly on the tension between groups backing different approaches to constitutional interpretation. Unsurprisingly, there are several school of thought that scholars can follow – strict constructionism, originalism, textualism, living constitution, living tree doctrine, moral constitution, and original intent are the main ones.*
What we haven’t discuss much here is what Americans in general think of the U.S. Constitution and its interpretation. As part of an article written by Richard Stengel, TIME conducted a survey of over 1,000 Americans back in June to see where they fell on the issues. They relayed some of their results in graphic formats for easy viewing and it’s an intriguing little peak into current attitudes. You can find the full page of graphs here.
Snippet from the Stengel article:
Americans have debated the Constitution since the day it was signed, but seldom have so many disagreed so fiercely about so much. Would it be unconstitutional to default on our debt? Should we have a balanced-budget amendment? Is it constitutional to ask illegal immigrants to carry documents? The past decade, beginning with the disputed election of 2000, has been a long national civics class about what the Constitution means — and how much it still matters.
* according to Wikipedia. So take from that what you will…

Please email your essay, by September 20th, to: 